Search

Low-cost carriers: 'Hidden charges' and Ancillary revenue to boost activities PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 17 September 2009 12:18

How did low-cost carriers managed to turn extra charges to an incredible cash machine, avoiding a tragic fall due to their poor financial results? Credit card booking, food and beverages on board, priority boarding, seat choice, insurance... almost everything with low-cost carriers is 'ancillary revenue'. These revenues are not ‘bonuses' for carriers, but essential to offset the low prices of tickets. Jay Sorensen, President of IdeaWorks declared: "The sickly patient known as the world's airline industry suffered through 2008 and only survived due to dramatic schedule cutbacks, the slow reversal of fuel prices and an intravenous injection of ancillary revenue." Now, the time is running out to find new best ideas to make passengers consume the most.

 

A study led by IdeaWorks revealed the total raised by Ryanair through 'ancillary revenue' soared by 73 per cent between 2006 and 2008 to hit 622 million Euros a year. They amounted to 19.3 per cent of Ryanair's total income, which ranked the Irish carrier in second place worldwide for that standing. SWOT analysis and recent announcements of Ryanair are clear: they will raise fees everywhere possible, challenging customers and their travel habits. Even if some announcements were clearly a part of the smart PR, like charging for toilets on board or the 'fat tax' on passengers, others are already ongoing. For instance, from October 1st, Ryanair declared it would increase its luggage charges by 50 per cent, which will force passengers checking in two bags to pay about 100 Euros per flight (30 Euros for the first bag and 70 Euros for the second one). Passengers, who don't hold a Visa Electron card, will have to pay 10 Euros extra, 6 Euros more per flight for priority boarding...

Credit: TheSun.co.ukShort on new ideas, Ryanair decided to ask their customers to give them some. That's how Ryanair launched a 1000 Euro game, last March, for best idea on making money with 'ancillary revenues'. Most of the ideas were just for fun, but at least Ryanair knows how to communicate and use social media for the business.

However, these 'ancillary revenues' are often considered as 'stealth charges' by local authorities and consumer groups. For instance, the regional government in the Balearic Islands has started legal proceedings against Ryanair for its 'hidden charges'. Officials from the government's consumer protection department noticed that Ryanair was charging passengers who had bought tickets online 19 Euros extra for a boarding card and 19 Euros for each bags checked in at airports in Mallorca, Minorca and Ibiza, which is a breach of consumer protection regulations. Similar legal proceedings have been taken against Vueling.

Few days ago, the Agencia Catalana de Consum (ACC) has opened files against Ryanair, easyJet and Vueling for the same reasons. ACC declared to have received almost 1700 claims for the first seven months of 2009, and expects more to come after the holidays (Ryanair focusing 50% of total complaints filed so far). 20% of these claims concern the billing charge for luggage, considered as an "abusive" practice by the ACC, because it leaves no alternative to the customers booking an Internet flight. Article 97 of current regulation (Act 48/1960) stipulates that "the carrier must carry along with travelers, and within the price of the ticket, baggage, with the weight and volume set regulations. The excess will be subject to special provision. The objects and hand luggage that travelers carry can't be considered baggage to this effect". Joaquim Bernat, Head of department Regulation & Proceeds of ACC, declared: "The law is clear in this regard (...). So we're going to punish, because we consider it illegal".

Low-cost carriers disagree with these legal proceedings, but the stake is important for them. If they lose their trials, this will have a significant impact on their business, as more bags means more ground handling staff and more expenses. Furthermore, if these legal actions are successful, these low-cost carriers could face fines ranging from 2 870 Euros to 286 800 Euros.

Authorities are not the only ones in the front line. Consumer groups regularly points out low-cost carriers and their 'hidden charges'. In June 2009, Which? Holiday, a consumers watchdog in the UK, has reported that passengers were automatically charged for travel insurance by airlines, in breach of a European Union ban on the practice. This report specifically points out three low-cost carriers: easyJet, Jet2.com and Monarch airlines, which are all adding the insurance fee when passengers book online. Usually, consumers do not notice the insurance fee, and end up paying it. Which? Holiday also published a report last year about ancillary revenues of low-cost carriers, especially lunch on board. "Food and drink onboard no-frills flights can cost almost half as much as the actual flight", warned Which? Holiday. The consumer group found Ryanair to be the most expensive, Flybe was the second most expensive, and BMIbaby was the cheapest.

James Fremantle of airline watchdog the Air Transport Users Council said: "There has to be a limit to the charges that the low-cost carriers are dreaming up to impose on consumers. Families and the elderly will find it much harder to avoid them". Even some analysts denounced these practices: Bob Atkinson, expert of TravelSupermarket.com, declared: "Easyjet has achieved this result, in part, by confusing customers through a complicated booking process and a series of hidden charges."... The moral of the story: be careful when booking on low-fare carriers, because sometimes you might end up being charged for a lot of 'extras' that you didn't know about, nor need.

Low-cost carriers strategy to face drop of demand

---
Matthias, WhichBudget Airline Market Analyst

 
Comments (6)
Ryanair 'hidden charges'
6 Monday, 23 November 2009 17:35
Martino

Marek, thanks for your thoughts. That's the thing with Ryanair: people either love them (because they know how to 'play the game' and get 1 euro tickets) or hate them. While some will be happy to pay for extras, others will see them as unfair and unnecessary. As you rightly pointed out, even non-LCCs are making their customers pay for what they consider extras.

Ryanair 'hidden charges'
5 Friday, 20 November 2009 00:00
Marek Maslowiec

There is always problem to decide very clearly, what is a 'hidden charge', what's not... At the moment almost all LCC airlines (the most important Ryanair) in my opinion quite clear policy regarding their fares, tickets and all extras.

I know that some ideas of MOL are quite revolutionary, others are just PR (I'll mention it later), but 3 or 4 years ago nobody would imagine, that it may really work... To force, or better to teach passengers to travel only with handbag. FR introduced the check-in baggage fee and everybody was saying 'that's stupid', 'that's irrational' etc. Now - almost all LCC treat your check-in bag as 'something extra', "if you want it - pay", my dear client. FR changed their fees for the baggage (from 10 EUR per sector) but the price increase only affects passengers travelling with 1 check-in bag (still 10kg hand bag is allowed for free) - pax with 2 bags will save 200 EUR (before 15kg x 15EUR + 10 EUR extra piece = 235 EUR), now it costs "only 35 EUR". This price change will not affect at all clients travelling with handbags only and there is higher and higher amount of these... So, in general, it's not bad and it clearly shown on the website and during the booking process.

Regarding MOL's "crazy" ideas reg. 'WC fee' etc. I just love it. He's the best with such PR. Everybody knows that it's not possible (almost) to do that, but every single newspaper, internet media, tv is talking about it. And MOL is so happy because of that. Free advertisement! 24h/day. OK, another 1000 clients will hate him, but 100 000 will open ryanair website and maybe now (or in the future) will buy FR flight... That's much cheaper than paying for the official rates for ads... And they keep doing it all the time... Starting with 'error in FR booking system' (few months ago, when they had 0,01 fares for 2 days on almost all their routes - I'm pretty sure that was done in purpouse - everybody was saying 'that's true - they have free flights' - later they've done it few times, but as an official sale) and finishing on the latest 'wc fee' (and few other)... They (media) buy it all the time...

Again, going back to the problem with the European law which require to advertise full price. This sentence 'total price' doesn't have to include your check-in baggage (can travel without it... as 100 other pax), credit card fee (you can have Visa Electron... if don't - why airline has to bother?), priority boarding (it's not free in LH, AZ, QF etc... so why FR can't charge for it?), seat selection (why can't we charge you for the 'luxury' you want?) etc...

I know, it is difficult for some people, especially if they don't book it very often, but that's not mission impossible. You can fly with some airlines for few euro, you don't have to buy meal on-board, you don't have to be first on board etc... If you want, you can pay and you'll have what you want, our dear LCC passenger. :)

LCCs are aware of the "consumer acceptance" and won't go further
4 Wednesday, 30 September 2009 12:47
Roman

I think LCCs know that they can't go further with their charging ancillary revenue policy. Even the main European low cost carriers recently admitted at the Low cost summit! Flybe chief Mike Rutter "asks the industry to heed this call for self-control" Only Ryanair didn't approve or even comment on this matter. However, their last announcement, to increase bag check-in fees by 50% seem to show a different strategy.

Low-cost carriers: 'Hidden charges' and Ancillary revenue to boost activities
3 Tuesday, 22 September 2009 00:00
Ofer

You are probably right. In some cases the Law demand that Suppliers will publish only final fare and show all hidden costs in advance. If so, it may be difficult to expose dozen of "anciallry" revenues....Anyway some people do not like to be asked to pay for every step - it is a mentality difference between North America and Middle East fo example. Beside that, there is a "wave" of behaviour and that trend might end someday soon..

Low-cost carriers: 'Hidden charges' and Ancillary revenue to boost activities
2 Monday, 21 September 2009 00:00
Martino

Actually, not sure if there is a separation between LCCs and legacy airlines either with respect to charging ancillary revenue (legacy airlines are copying LCCs and are also charging for seat assignment, checked-in luggage, etc) or with respect to facing huge losses (just look at MyAir and SkyEurope's recent collapse). What do you think consumers will "learn"? Aren't they already aware of ancillary charges but have no other choice than to accept them?

Low-cost carriers: 'Hidden charges' and Ancillary revenue to boost activities
1 Thursday, 17 September 2009 00:00
Ofer

The complete article is very instructive. The current situation with customers facing LCC "ancillary revenue" is much worst than what I had in mind till now. The only problem is that it takes the consumers years to learn it, meanwhile Legacy Airlines face huge losses and some close down completely...

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: